AI constrained by ministry guardrails — an architecture, not a disclaimer. Anchored to non-negotiable doctrine, it keeps outputs theologically sound where generic models can't.
Purpose-built, structured outputs for real church work — sermons, budgets, events, discipleship — instead of open-ended generation that needs constant correction.
A church profile and context library — voice, theology, calendar, patterns — that compounds over time, creating switching costs that deepen with every use.
| Capability | Church management systems | Generic AI | ChurchHUB.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry workflow intelligence | ✕ | ~ | ✓ |
| Theological guardrails | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Structured, ministry-ready outputs | ✕ | ~ | ✓ |
| Purpose-built ministry tools | ~ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Persistent contextual workspace | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Operational capacity reallocation | ~ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Layer | Churches | × annual revenue per church | = Market | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total addressable market | 355,000 | $982 | $349M | Hartford Institute — U.S. Christian churches |
| Serviceable available market | 110,000 | $982 | $108M | Gloo Holdings, Form 10-K (FY2025) |
| Serviceable obtainable market (4-yr) | 9,000 | $982 | $8.8M | Breeze growth benchmark; this round funds ~1,500 |
| Plan | Users included | Annual price | $/user/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo | 1 | $599 | $49.91 |
| Team | 2 | $899 | $37.46 |
| Staff | 5 | $1,199 | $19.98 |
| Staff+ | 10 | $1,499 | $12.49 |
| Ministry | 15 | $1,999 | $11.10 |
| Ministry+ | 20 | $2,499 | $10.41 |
| Organization | 25 | $2,999 | $10.00 |
| Organization+ | 50 | $4,999 | $8.33 |
Blended annual revenue per church of $982 is the population-weighted average across these tiers at the projected plan mix. The early conference pipeline blends to ~$1,074 — above $982 — so the model treats $982 as a conservative floor.
Adjust the assumptions and see where ChurchHUB.AI remains viable. These are the exact challenges management expects you to bring.
The ratio is robust — but breakeven and Year-1 net operating income move under the harder scenarios. Both are shown on purpose: the point isn't that nothing changes, it's that the business stays viable even when it does.